Nanotech Micro Machines & Psychological Warfare: How to Make a Vastly Superior Force Give Up Without a Fight

By "vastly superior force" I mean the armed-to-the-teeth US public, and "by give up without a fight" I mean go down in utter humiliation in the annals of infamy forever.

The reason we have to be wary of uncritically accepting the nanotech story is that a very common psyop tactic that has been used since the beginning of time in warfare is to convince your enemy that the fight is unwinnable, so that they just give up.

And when I say since the beginning of time I mean since at least the beginning of the war for resources amongst complex lifeforms, i.e. not just human beings.

The story of life has always been a story of competition over resources and territory. There is a battle being waged in every jungle for access to the power of the sun, upon which the entire ecosystem of the planet depends.

Every plant and animal species is in a life or death struggle for survival at all times and those that have evolved together have done so in an arms race that maintains a stable equilibrium until an exogenous force disrupts it.

Plants employ many physical defenses like thorns, and chemical defenses like poisons, and believe it or not they even employ psychological warfare tactics, one of the more ingenious is described here:

“Some plants mimic the presence of insect eggs on their leaves, dissuading insect species from laying their eggs there. Because female butterflies are less likely to lay their eggs on plants that already have butterfly eggs, some species of neotropical vines of the genus Passiflora (Passion flowers) contain physical structures resembling the yellow eggs of Heliconius butterflies on their leaves, which discourage oviposition by butterflies.^[69]”

You would think plants would be at the ultimate disadvantage since, with a few exceptions, they can hardly be said to be mobile from the perspective of their predators, and yet they use trickery to survive.

Another common example is the Mimosa pudica plant (commonly called the “touch me not”) - it’s thought that it shuts its leaves in response to touch in order to appear wilted and unnappetising to predators.

Similarly many animals when confronted by danger will make themselves look as large as possible in an attempt to scare off a would be predator, by raising their hackles, or just standing up tall and raising their limbs over their heads:

Of course humans have always been the king of the jungle when it comes to psyops, what with our relative lack of strength and speed, we’ve always had to use our brains to outsmart our opponents from other species and from our own.

Here’s one historic example:

"During World War II, a group of five Germans, under the command of Fritz Klingenberg, fought garrison troops and captured the entire city of Belgrade and its thousands of troops by pretending to be an entire army."

This utterly abysmal failure of military prowess should live on in infamy forever.

A less extreme example occurred in 1812 when a small Canadian group prevented a US invasion and conquest of Canada despite being outnumbered by forces in a superior position. General Isaac Brock dressed some of his poorly trained regulars in spare Redcoat uniforms (the British Redcaots were famously well trained and formidable opponents in battle), and then marched his men in circles in front of Fort Detroit to give the appearance of having many more men than he actually did. He also begged the US to surrender because he felt he would be unable to prevent the Indians fighting with him from scalping the American soldiers when they were defeated.

The US commander surrendered to this elaborate fakery without a fight.

Since then the US military and intelligence community have more than made up for their past failings, by mastering the art of psychological warfare, and turning it not only against their enemies without, but against their enemies within, namely the freedom loving American public.

I would argue that factions within the US security state are very likely trying to not only divide Americans, but also convince them that they have a overwhelming technological advantages in the forms of injectable mind control nanotech, alien aircraft, constant surveillance, AI systems, etc, while distracting us from the actual mind control technology of social media algorithms, and constantly attempting to weaken our second amendment rights.

Because the truth is that the US populace is the most armed civilian group in the history of the world and far outnumbers and outguns the US military and police forces.

There are far too few soldiers and policemen in the US to effectively create a Stalinesque police state.

The only way to control us is to convince us we are helpless against them.

Like Fox Mulder in the X-Files TV series, “I want to believe", but remain unconvinced by the nanotech in vaccines theory (or the aliens).

If you'd like to hear a high level gloss of all the lines of "evidence" it's in the below interview, which you can preview on our Rumble channel or watch in it’s entirety at our own streaming platform at pro.longcovidreset.com.

---

---

I'm unconvinced because a scientific theory should be falsifiable - i.e. you should be able to prove it false if it is false.

If you try disproving it in every way you can think of and it remains unassailable, you tend to become more and more convinced of its truth.

The proponents of the nanotech theory seem to come at it from an unscientific perspective of unquestioning belief, even though they sound scientific because they throw around a lot of weird sounding sciencey words that even they often don't seem to fully understand.

This is an example of the approach: the fact that they see what look like "flashing lights" under the microscope proves that there is nanotech.

They don't wonder if there is a physical science explanation like refractive particles spinning in the fluid scattering light of different wavelengths making it look like something is flashing.

It's like saying the stars are giant LEDs in space being turned off and on, because they appear to be twinkling.

But we know that stars don't actually twinkle, it just looks like they do and we know they aren't giant LEDs floating in space, because the various theories about stars were falsified and we were left with one that has many different lines of evidence converging.

Similarly the appearance of growing “nanotech” within blood mixed with the vaccines could be explained by undirected physical processes similar to what you see when you mix various chemicals together and you get what appears like plant growth in a “chemical garden” science experiment that you may have done in grade school:

There are a number of other supposed effects seen that are all very interesting and that I can't explain, but they need someone with an electrical engineering background to confirm in person.

For example the broadcasting of internet of things “MAC addresses” by vaxxed individuals alive and dead (!) should be easy to confirm in controlled conditions, but the conditions of the experiments conducted weren't described.

Just walking by a graveyard and saying you can detect MAC addresses isn’t good enough.

Anyone can detect dozens of internet enabled devices with their phone in any public space.

The level of vitriol around this story is also off the charts, which is another clue to a bot-infested psyop.

People start calling you names and insulting you as soon as you start questioning it instead of just calmly explaining the science behind it.

After watching a number of videos of people claiming nanotech in the shots, I'm left not having seen any real science, or even scientific thinking, just a bunch of smart sounding words and phrases without much meaning evident behind them.

I'm not an engineer, but engineers who've watched this are also unconvinced.

Pathologist Ryan Cole has examined the shots and the blood and not found any evidence of nano-bots. He doesn’t strike me as controlled opposition - after all he’s being taken to the woodshed by the medical esastablishment.

source

Extreme claims require extreme evidence, especially in an age when everything is a psyop until proven otherwise.

Note: this is not to say that live blood analysis isn't helpful or that there are not blood abnormalities caused by the chemical constituents of vaccines, or that EDTA chelation, which Dr Mihalcea recommends, doesn't help.

If you or someone you know hasn't improved with other therapies by all means try EDTA chelation to see if it helps you.

Now if someone more knowledgeable than me could do UFO’s … oops UAVs, I’d be grateful.

What I see is that both the right and the left are now propagating narratives that ultimately lead to enhanced government control.

The left has their ocean boiling and pandemic preparedness narratives, while the right has … UAVs. I did a double take when Tucker Carlson, in the midst of a long monologue that had me nodding along in agreement, suddenly said almost offhand that obviously there are aliens … excuse me? It’s obvious now?

A “former” US intelligence whistleblower does not a credible witness make.

Remember the Rockefeller’s have long angled for a world government and they’ve known for decades that the way to implement it is to frighten us into obedience via pandemics, climate catastrophes, and/or aliens.

Looks like we’re gonna get all three.

---